top of page
Search

Dear Dr. Minter-Jordan. . . .#2

  • deusrichard
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • 3 min read

Updated: Feb 14, 2025

We have 6 days until you need to, on behalf of AARP, post a $2.2M bond in order to continue my discrimination and persecution. Today we will focus on the Ethics and Compliance Officer who produced the two "investigation" reports.


As I testified to, when I was intereviewed by Mr. Easley with Rebecca Mason taking notes on January 31st, 2018, it felt like he had already made up his mind I was guilty. You can see it in the notes that were produced - first they don't have all the information I shared and secondly, there is a running narrative about how I was lying. No matter what information I shared with Mr. Easley, it wasn't fitting the narrative he had already established. Gay people are liars, thus I am a liar. Also, Ms. Mason was taking the notes but the notes we saw came directly from Mr. Easley with his running commentary on - you guessed it - how I am a liar.


AARP produced 4 "investigations" done by Mr. Easley with people who were directly related to my lawsuit. In three, he noted where he factually found the others he investigated lying based on hard evidence, but each time explained their lying away. He gave them a pass. My investigation had a "LYING" section - the only one and each point in there was his assertion based on his opinion without hard proof.


Example: He focused on my day in NYC down to the minute - where I had lunch was (apparently) .7 miles from the Source office (just did google maps - it is .6 miles and a 15 minute walk), my lunch check stated 1:59 pm when I said I was done around 1:30 - so, I am a liar. It didn't matter that I was in NYC, I had lunch at the restaurant I said I did, produced a receipt for reimbursement, the restaurant was close to where my meeting was, and I went to the meeting which is why I was in NYC. None of that is disputed. I am a liar because my recollection was off by 29 minutes. Was this a murder investigation?!?


I am going to take you to 2019, Mr. Easley's deposition. Picture it, 7-8 of us in the room including the court reporter and Mr. Easley is shaking violently and has flop sweat the entire deposition. I guess this is what happens when a bully who has never been held accountable is finally called to account for their actions. After the deposition, my attorney and I were discussing Mr. Easley - the flop sweat and uncontrollable shaking and the court reporter stated she thought he had an advance case of Parkinson's. That was how notable his bodily movements were. That was not the case, he was just never held accountable - this was his first deposition. Makes you wonder how many other people he targeted and discriminated against, but they couldn't afford to fight?!?


Back to 2024 and Mr. Easley's time on the stand. Mr. Easley testified he had no idea I was gay when he did the New York investigation, but he did know during the Sugar Bowl investigation. Again, here is the problem, as I testified during trial and is even on his notes, Mr. Easley only interviewed me one time on January 31, 2018 and the reports as I have already shared were produced on the same day. Two concurrent investigations, but we are supposed to believe you knew I was gay for one but not the other?

It is also notable, Mr. Easley testified and confirmed on the stand, the final official reports are dated February 26, 2018. . . here's the problem I was fired on February 22, 2018. So, I was fired before the final, official report was issued. .which means, they were always going to fire me, regardless of what the report said. . . .

I'll leave with one last insight on Mr. Easley, during my "interview" he specifically asked me if I had received a jacket or vest as part of the swag (Stuff We All Get) from Allstate. I said yes. Apparently, Mr. Easley learned from my employee Mr. Herd that this jacket existed, thus why he asked me about it. Of course, for Mr. Herd - the straight man who kept his job, that the jacket was totally fine, but during my interview I was told I violated the Code of Conduct by accepting it as it was considered a Valuable Privilege. Look at Mr. Herd's testimony here:


12.16.24 - The clock is counting down Dr. Minter-Jordan - what type of CEO are you going to be? One that continues to discriminate or one who makes AARP a better place and does good. The world is watching.



 
 
 

Comments


This blog contains both facts, as well as my personal assessments and opinions about my litigation and AARP.  If you do not agree with this, then you should not read this blog.  The information on this site is provided "as-is" and the views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other entity.

bottom of page